About Theodore L. Mariash Law Office

Being an effective lawyer requires you to be able to objectively make difficult decisions and ensure your clients are well-advised as to their legal best interests.

At Theodore L. Mariash Law Office, we live and breath court.  We accomplish some of our goals the old-fashioned way: we prefer in-person client interviews which begin and end with a hand shake. We insist our clients are fully-informed to make the hard objective decisions required to obtain the best possible result for their case.  We do our utmost to ensure we are available to answer your phone calls or emails as they come in.

The lawyers at Theodore L. Mariash Law Office have all obtained a reputation for being fully prepared, diligent, skilled, learned, creative, and effective.  This opinion is shared by many members of the judiciary, of the various police services we have to challenge on a regular basis in our clients’ best interests, and of the prosecution services we battle in court via the adversarial system of law; this is in addition to our clients who refer our names to their friends and family should they ever come into conflict with the criminal law.

Theodore L. Mariash and his team of 4 lawyers understand the massive emotional, social, and financial impact of being charged with a criminal offense.

Abraham Lincoln, himself a courtroom lawyer before his rise in politics, is widely regarded as coining the phrase: “If you are your own lawyer, you have a fool for a client.”

Without experience in the criminal litigation process, you will not know whether you will win or lose, how to defend your case, or what to expect for punishment. You will overlook important details that could affect the outcome of your case.

Choose a law firm skilled in the art of criminal defense.

On February 18, 2013, Theodore L. Mariash Law Office was established. Prior to that, Theodore L. Mariash learned the fundamentals of what it takes to be a top lawyer from an experienced practitioner for nearly 6 years.

Innocent people can and will be wrongfully charged with serious crimes.  One of the primary weaknesses of the Canadian criminal legal system is that uncorroborated allegations by non-credible witnesses can and will result in criminal charges.  The standard to lay charges is that the police have reasonable and probable grounds to arrest.  While that sounds reassuring, in real life and practice, it is a ridiculously low standard which results in too many lives being destroyed by the mere utterance of a false allegation.  The legal system is so far removed from the concept that “anyone can lie for any reason” that patently ridiculous charges make their way to trial.  This is especially true for cases of allegations made by children.  It is for this reason that we do not shy away from any client who comes to us in need, no matter how gruesome, brutal, horrific, or sensational their alleged crime is.  We have represented well over 100 clients charged with serious sexual offenses against children and have fought to the bitter end for them.  It is not our role to judge; we are here to defend.

Make no mistake about it: Just because we strive to practice with civility does not mean we do not recognize there is a time when the proverbial gloves must come off.  When the situation or client requires it, we are the most ferocious, intimidating, and relentless courtroom attorneys permitted by law.  While I am ethically prohibited from using the term “aggressive” to define myself, feel free to ask virtually anyone in the courthouse who is the most “aggressive lawyer” they’ve ever met.  I do not doubt I would be frequently mentioned in such conversations; I wear the snide insults and cheap shots from the losers with pride.

Mr. Mariash and his associates know that hiring a criminal defence lawyer may be the most important decision you make in your life. It is crucial to choose the best lawyer for your individual case. Meet a lawyer

Theodore L. Mariash

I was called to the Bar on June 19, 2008, and have been in court almost every single day for the past 14 years.  I graduated with my juris doctor from the University of Manitoba in 2007.  Prior to law school, my undergraduate studies were completed at the I.H. Asper School of Business with a double-major in accounting and finance.  Happily for me, I realized at the last second accounting would not suit my talents.  I wrote the LSAT on 6 days notice and gained entry to law school on my first application shortly thereafter.

I believe there is no substitute for hard work to ensure I am fully-prepared for anything which may come out during a trial. The law is so broad that it takes significant commitment to research and professional development to be a top lawyer engaging in best practices. Most of my clientele have had other lawyers in their past. I have been told often by my clients that I am the best lawyer they’ve ever had. It is for that reason that I command a significant degree of client loyalty and satisfaction.

I believe there is no substitute for courtroom experience of which my time spent in court is extensive.  I am literally always present.  I have appeared before the Manitoba Court of Appeal on 19 occasions.  My first appeal, R. v. Draper, 2010 MBCA 35, was successfully argued with judgment delivered on March 31, 2010. I am proud that I contributed to defining the laws of consecutive sentencing and range of sentences for robberies as well as expanding legal protections for individuals diagnosed with FASD (fetal alcohol spectrum disorder).

I have conducted approximately 45 trials before the Court of Queen’s Bench, although I have prepared for many more which ultimately resulted in an favourable plea bargain for my client.  Of those trials, 10 of them have been before a jury.  I have represented approximately 50 clients charged with murder, manslaughter, or other offense causing death.  I have represented approximately 220 clients charged with sexual offenses, with half of those cases being allegations against children (sexual interference primarily).  I have represented persons charged with every possible weapons and firearms offense in law, literally too many times to give an accurate count, other than to say several dozen per year.  I have represented clients on exceptionally serious crimes such as home invasion robberies, human trafficking, kidnapping, explosives trafficking, narcotics trafficking and production, impaired driving causing death and/or bodily harm, and attempted murder.  In total, I have run approximately 250 trials over my career and prepared for approximately 1250 more.

I have represented well over 1000 clients charged with domestic violence, such as assault, uttering threats, or breaching a protection order.  I have set aside protection orders and peace bonds.

I have conducted well over 1000 contested bail applications, both in the Provincial Court of Manitoba and the Court of Queen’s Bench.

I have conducted well over 2000 sentencings during my career.

I have resorted to the use of prerogative writs to assist my clients, doing cases in the areas of certiorari, mandamus, and habeas corpus.  I have challenged mandatory minimum sentences and will continue to do so as I believe mandatory minimum sentences result in unjust sentences.

In sum, I have appeared in every level of court in Manitoba on virtually ever crime before every judge at all levels of court (other than the most recent appointments to the Bench).

I believe in being transparent and open, both personally and professionally. I have nothing to hide and I feel like my clients trust me better for telling them the truth of their situation. I believe there are too many unscrupulous lawyers out there who gain clients by patently misrepresenting either their level of experience or expertise in law or both. The other side of this mercurial coin is the lawyer who falsely advises their client they have nothing to worry about when, in fact, there is much to be concerned with and a lot of evidence to neutralize.

I have continuously fought for greater protections in law for indigenous offenders, to expand the true scope of section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code of Canada.  I have fought to educate the judiciary on the history of racism perpetuated under the pretenses of the Indian Act and the resulting harm which befell the various First Nations of Canada.  Until enough judges and politicians understand that the tools they use to measure risk punish those who have been multi-generationally victimized by the Indian Act and instead reward those people who intentionally live a life of crime, I will refuse to let this subject go.  I am pleased that the Prime Minister referred to the systemic abuses against indigenous people as genocide.  Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide lists “Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group”, “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”, and “Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group” as genocide.

I continue to advocate about the conditions found on many Reserves throughout Manitoba to this day.  The idea that some Reserves don’t even have plumbing with clean water is such a monstrous affront to how Canada advertises itself to the rest of the world.

I have always been entrusted to run organizations.  I was the president of the United Way’s Youth Connections Council between 1999-2001.  I was elected Senator to the University of Manitoba Senate between 2002-2003.  I was the treasurer and member of the Executive Committee and Board of Directors for the John Howard Society of Manitoba between 2006-2015.  I have been co-commissioner for the Bar Association Baseball League since 2016. All of this is in addition to running my own law firm since February 18, 2013.

On the personal side of things, I primarily occupy my free-time learning. I eschew social media as a giant waste of time; I have learned the history of a great many subjects using free resources such as Wikipedia and supplemented by being a voracious reader of scientifically valid peer-reviewed literature. I believe it is important to support local business and charities.

I have a love of art, history, and strategy. History is replete with tales of fantastic truth which is too often forgotten. Current events often mimic history, politics, and/or art, yet not many are aware of the significance or how we are repeating the mistakes of our past. It is not enough to sit by the wayside as we ever increasingly approach the reality that we will repeat the horrors which followed the grotesque events in Danzig on November 9-10, 1938.

My inspiration in life is to emulate Alexander Suvarov. He is the only undefeated general in history, having gone 63-0 in major conflicts, typically defeating armies 2-5 times larger than his own. He would stand with his soldiers in the heart of a battle because he knew that’s where his army was most vulnerable. He was seriously wounded 6 times and never once wavered in his commitment to holding the front line. He eschewed gaudy tradition in favour of lethal effectiveness. My other idols include Raoul Wallenberg, Stanislav Petrov, Stephen Jay Gould, and Arminius.

I try to live my life by the Latin maxim audentes Fortuna iuvat: “Fortune favours the bold”.

I’ve been told by many people I have a great courtroom/radio voice.  It is the lowest a human voice can go, also known as basso profundo.  I know this is not a typical lawyers about page as those typically put me to sleep.  But I am not a typical lawyer.  I am not afraid to speak out against the injustices we have not yet solved to this day.  I do not kneel.  I will not be silenced. My voice will be heard.

“But then who will watch the watch dogs?”

Back to top

Theodore L. Mariash Law Office
Barristers, Solicitors & Notary Public